This is an excellent blog post from a student/teacher of the teachings of G. I. Gurdjieff - a Sufi Master who developed a distinctive Practice, a Way, to become One again with our True Nature. The title says it all so I will let this wonderful blog by Lee van Laer take it from here. Enjoy!
Namaste'
 ~ By  Lee van Laer, a member of the New York Gurdjieff Foundation
This morning, I was pondering the role of time, and ended up reading part of Dogen's Uji,  or, “existence–time.”
 In the Tanahashi translation (Shambhala, 2011), we hear:
“Know that in this way there are myriads of forms and hundreds of 
grasses [all things] throughout the entire earth, and yet each grass and
 each form itself is the entire earth. The study of this is the 
beginning of practice."
"When you are at this place, there is just one grass, there is just one 
form; there is understanding of form and beyond understanding of form; 
there is understanding of grass and beyond understanding of grass. Since
 there is nothing but just this moment, the time being is all the time 
there is. Grass being, form being, are both time. Each moment is all 
being, each moment is the entire world. Reflect now whether any being or
 any world is left out of the present moment.”
 Because Dogen routinely presents sophisticated ideas, and because his 
arguments appear to be dense and complex, one tends to be drawn towards 
abstract, or intellectual, analysis. So much of his work reads like an 
argument of this kind, one is perhaps tempted to be academic about it.
 Yet I think that the whole point of his arguments is to defeat such an 
approach. His ubiquitous, self-reflective dialectic isn't meant as a de 
facto call to complexity; rather, it is to point our own complexity out 
to us, calling our attention to the fact that we are perpetually trapped
 in dualistic complications. His words and statements, one after 
another, throughout his teaching, morph into koans. Each one tries to 
point beyond the dualism that we know, the affirming and denying, 
towards a third force–a force of reconciliation–that we are not 
sensitive to. Gurdjieff, one may recall, indicated that man is “third 
force blind.” We are unaware of this reconciling factor, which could 
otherwise make the world whole.
Sp there is nothing academic or intellectual about this brief passage. 
We are called, rather, to a sensitive emotional moment: in this 
translation, the point has been deftly realized by referring to grass. 
(The Nishijima and Cross translation,which has its own transcendental 
moments, does not quite rise to the occasion in the same way this time.)
 Associations are called forth: the green color of grass, the delicacy 
of grass, its tenderness, flexibility, suppleness. The way that grass 
cover surfaces gently, its movement in wind, the ability of grass to be 
composed of myriad forms (blades) and yet be one thing, acting together,
 seen together, experienced together.
Buried deep in this teaching- in all of Dogen's teachings- are body, 
blood, bones and marrow, not just of the intellect, but of an emotional opening.
We are called to a simple moment, a moment that has nothing to do with 
trying to figure things out. We are called to this immediate moment. We 
are called to a relationship with grass, to form-  to a relationship 
with both our inability to understand form and the existence of form 
itself. Our awareness becomes a bridge in which we inhabit both the 
condition and our failure to understand the condition. ( I am reminded 
of my conversation with my daughter last night, in which she pointed out
 that for Kant, the sublime– the quality of spiritual purity or 
excellence–begins with our failure, our inability, to comprehend... "the study of this is the beginning of practice."
We discover feeling.
 An emotional opening to the quality of grass and the existence of form 
brings us to a moment where wholeness is possible. Nothing is left out 
of the present moment. We are called to understand– and do not 
understand– the present moment, at the same time. Our understanding 
lies– as the understanding of Socrates lay– in being neither wise with 
our wisdom, nor stupid within our stupidity, but being just as we are.
"The wisest of you men is he who has realized, like Socrates, that in respect of wisdom he is really worthless." (Plato: The Collected Dialogues, Apology, p. 9, Hamilton & Cairns, Princeton University Press, 1989)
Hence we discover blades of grass that gather themselves together in a 
landscape: Zen Masters,  German philosophers, wise Greeks. All of them 
understanding that while we try, and while we fail, we still inhabit the
 wholeness of all the forms we know– and that this wholeness comprises 
an ineffable truth that cannot be denied.
Jeanne de Salzmann calls us back over and over to this act of seeing, 
this act of inhabiting the moment. Nothing is left out of the present 
moment. We do not need to change the present moment. The need is for the
 present moment to be seen.
It is not the present moment, its nature, or its content, that distracts
 us from experience and relationship; the present moment, its nature, 
and its contents are completely valid and true. They need not change; 
only our relationship to them must change.
Don't think about the grass... be the grass.
 I respectfully ask you to take good care. 
* 
“There do exist enquiring minds, which long for the truth of the 
heart, seek it, strive to solve the problems set by life, try to 
penetrate to the essence of things and phenomena and to penetrate into 
themselves.  If a man reasons and thinks soundly, no matter which path 
he follows in solving these problems, he must inevitably arrive back at 
himself, and begin with the solution of the problem of what he is 
himself and what his place is in the world around him.”


No comments:
Post a Comment